Thank you for all your contributions, Cagney! I was glad for others joining in!
I was also glad to see the Perry house; And the newspaper’s visages of characters in the case.
We were lucky, tho, to have been able to authenticate photos, as a consortium of Stef, Harry and myself. We spent a lot of time comparing newly “revealed” pictures with existing visages and were also able to ask experts to confirm what we decided, before we ever showed them.
I think the portrait of Lizzie is not her, tho I am only using my instincts that I honed from those years of past comparisons. Websites you are not a part of, can have suspect pictures- we’ve all learned that from EBay.
It’s iffy about the “early” Abbie “enhanced”- you might want to submit that to the FRHS for confirmation?
The Morse picture is real and was of the set from Swansea research, and part of our Hatchet article. He is third from the right. Stef, Harry, Len Rebello and myself worked together on these. Stef actually has an article also, about facial feature comparisons. That was to prove or not, a newly found Emma picture, actually.
. . . . . . . .
This group picture has other Morse men, and the effects I had added, to post here much earlier, was to ask if these looked like hand signs attributing to Masons (the Lodge, not the family of “Mason”.)

Also, plz see next page for Porter’s Abbie.
https://lizzieandrewborden.com/HatchetO ... emery.html
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.