Mara wrote:Let me rephrase my question to Franz about the watch (or whatever) that the messenger asked Abby to fetch. I understand that Franz is now clarifying that the messenger would have told Abby to take the watch (or whatever) to the sick friend's house for Morse to collect.
If you believe in Lizzie's innocence, and Abby did indeed report to Lizzie that she'd received this note, why would she not also have told Lizzie that she would be taking Morse's watch (or whatever) with her as well, at his request? It would have made her story a stronger one.
And two follow-up questions:
1. How would Morse know this friend, well enough to send a messenger with a note to Abby about her/him? His visits to Fall River were related to, well, relations, and their business affairs.
2. Again (and again and again) Why would Morse want Abby and Andrew killed? You continue to avoid discussion of motive.
Mara, and others,
I am not avoiding nothing. It has been always a pleasure for me to discuss my theory. But I posted this new thread for another purpose, that’s why I entitled it “From another point of view…”
For example: I am more convinced of Lizzie’s innocence. Changing my mind, I would say: if Lizzie was guilty, I think she didn’t leave the house because she knew well that she herself was the killer, therefore there was no danger for her in the house; Lizzie didn’t suspect Bridget because she knew that she herself was the killer; she lied in her barn story because at that moment she was killing her father; the weapon was not found, probably she had hidden it in a very secret place in the house; she was immaculately clean because probably she didn’t catch many blood and she easily cleaned her up. She killed probably for money…
In the past I posted almost nothing in this manner, not because I am more convinced of her innocence, therefore I refuse to consider the case in this way, but just because I have nothing of new to add for the Lizzie being guilty theory.
New, I invite you to consider the case under the hypothesis that Lizzie was innocent. Most of you --- if not all of you --- are very convinced of her guilt. If you change your mind for a moment and consider the case assuming that the killer was an intruder, you can probably give very interesting contribution to the discussion. Someone could say (just an example): if so, I think the intruder could have entered from the side door, at what o’clock, etc…; another one: if so, I think Dr. Bowen could have been involved somehow in the murder; Abby was killed with her house clothes because…, etc, etc.
But according to what I read here, I think I am not fully understood. Or maybe I was understood well, but many of you don't consider, or refuse to consider the case from another point of view, one different of your own. Instead, you return always to my theory. Here is not the place for this. Every thread has its subject, right? To be honest I am a little disappointed.
(Mara and Curryong, and others, for Morse’s motive I have said all I can say in many previous posts of mine under other threads. And for the moment I have nothing of new to add. I’m sorry. And I beg you for another time to not discuss my theory here, under this thread. Thank you, girls and guys.)