On the original topic ...
> Does anyone know off hand of any other cases similar to Lizzie Borden's? Not any that deal with children or Jack the Ripper... I'm interested in studying others.
Well, depends on what kind of similarities you're looking for, I suppose. A weird comparison here, but Lizzie's case has always struck me as the O. J. Simpson murder case of that day. Some will disagree on some of these points, and admittedly some are overstated, but ... Both trials were media sensations. Both their defenders cynically used the media to bias the public. Both Lizzie and OJ were obviously guilty. Both should have been convicted based on the trial evidence. Both trials were administered by judges who skewed things toward the defense. Both defendants were acquitted by juries who chose to focus on who they were (Lizzie's gender; Simpson's race) rather than what they did. Both OJ and Lizzie were generally pariahs after their acquittals. If you're interested in the intersection of the judicial system, a sometimes reckless media, and popular prejudice, it might be worth a look.
Not to mention that memorable moment in Lizzie's trial, when one of the prosecutors accidentally allowed a bag to fall open and certain evidence to come into view prematurely, before he had even had a chance to mention it ... resulting in Lizzie suddenly and without warning coming face to face with her Daddy's skull

and further resulting in Lizzie fainting for several minutes (some courtroom theatre by Lizzie, perhaps?) ... an episode which probably created sympathy for her in the jurors' minds. As prosecutorial screw-ups go, this ranks right up there with, "would you try the glove on please, Mister Simpson?"
And also, both cases make great nursery rhymes!
O. J. Simpson took a knife
Plunged it into his ex-wife.
When he saw what he had done
Then he butchered Ron Goldman!