Ah, yes
Every opportunity I have I tell this story.
Flynn was a shady character. One of my best friends, who was a book dealer, said as much. And I found out that he was right.
Now you may say, that's not a nice thing to say MB. And It's not. But he plucked my displeasure at a book Fair back in the 80s and it went up my kazoo.
Now in the book trade there are rules. Rules that speak to standards, principle, common ethics. But Flynn could not abide by them since profit and greed ruled his better judgement. And being a book dealer he knew better.
The Fall River Tragedy was a rare book indeed. Two basic designations in the book trade for books which are difficult to find is: rare and scarce. Scarce is a book that you may have some trouble finding but they're out there. Rare is a term used in the book trade for a book that comes onto the market perhaps once a year. Or once every ten or twenty years. Porter's book was such a volume. Having it reprinted was a brilliant idea and Flynn, being from Fall River and in the book trade, came up with it.
So he printed an exact copy with similar boards. Once it gets beat up it almost looks like an original. It was printed as a limited edition of 1000 copies. I purchased them as an investment since I already had an original. Inside Flynns copy it stated that it was: "limited to one thousand copies. It soon sold out. The following year or so I came across Flynn's booth at a book fair. And there it was, six or seven copies on his self. I asked him about it since I knew he had sold out, to which he said:
"Oh, that's not the same book."
I looked it over and it was exactly the same book. I said:
"Yes it is."
To which he replied:
"That's a second edition."
I said to him:
"What do you mean a second edition? It said right in the book that it was limited to just 1000 copies. "
to which he casually declared:
"I took that page out."
This of course instantly cheapened the limited edition copy since he published another thousand copies exactly the same.
And he had a right to publish again if that's what he wished. But with a different cover, print, or format. One which did not look like the limited edition copies. All he had to do was publish it in paperback. To say the least, it p'ssed me of, if I can be so rude. It just did.
The same was true with the Borden title: The Girl in the House of Hate. It was suppose to be limited to 750 copies. But they kept on printing them with somewhat different covers and colors. And every one of them says limited to 750 copies. Must be a Lizzie thing.
Below are a couple editions of The Girl in the House of Hate by Charles and Louise Samuels. I prefer the paperback edition. Great cover. And at least limited to the time period when it was published in 1953. Copies in fine condition are worth more than the limited. And that's not the way it suppose to work. But not uncommon.
.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.