Page 2 of 2
Re: Jack the Ripper
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 7:43 pm
by debbiediablo
Maynard is nicely housetrained...cute might not cut it if he weren't!
Re: Jack the Ripper
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 3:56 pm
by Curryong
Have you been following the Edward's controversy at all since Maynard's arrival, debbie? I've been following it on Casebook JTR. Apparently the newspapers (notably 'the Independent') have now caught on to the work done by amateurs on that site. It appears Dr L. made a basic 'error of nomenclature'. If that's so, what a blow to his credibility!
Re: Jack the Ripper
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2014 9:49 pm
by debbiediablo
This is what Louhelainen says about it on his Facebook page:
Geoff Cross: Jari, the Independent seem to have their knives out for you, what is happening?
Jari Louhelainen: There is a rumour that one person linked to Ripper industry is behind it. It is the only paper which has been negative from the start. Also, The Independent has sued the publisher regarding something else so they clearly have an agenda.
October 21 at 12:48pm · Like · 3[quote][/quote]