Page 1 of 1
Are we gonna let 'em get away with this?
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 4:30 pm
by Constantine
Check out this article on cracked.com:
http://www.cracked.com/article_17314_5- ... facts.html
(It's the second item in the article.)
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 10:29 am
by snokkums
That's unbelieveable. It made for some fine reading. Thanks for posting it.
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 2:28 pm
by kssunflower
Finally, after 70 years ...

Does anyone know when the skulls were buried? Was it immediately after the trial?
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 11:08 am
by augusta
There's so much mis-information on the Borden case, it would take a lotta time and effort (in looking up the exact info) to correct every site that did it. I don't know if it'd be worth writing to the website or writer to correct them. Sometimes a website will just ignore you for your efforts, but they might correct it and thank you.
I did enjoy the link given for "History's Mysteries" on the hatchet.
The hip bath collection contained no skull at all, whether real or a cast of one. It did contain:
- Photographs
- Hatchet and hood
- Tags from trial exhibits
- Hair switch and bloody handkerchief
- Pillow sham and bedspreads
- Newspaper clippings of the case
- Stenographer's minutes of the preliminary trial
- Blueprints of floor plans of Borden house
- Boston Globe, day-to-day record
- Boston Herald - account of trial
- Hair in envelopes
- Red leather notebooks
Source: The Legend 100 Years After the Crime - A Conference on the Lizzie Borden case - Proceedings, Edited by Jules R. Ryckebusch, c 1993, Bristol Community College, Fall River, Massachusetts - King Philip Publishing Co., Portland, ME: Pages 213,214: "The Hip-Bath Collection" by Barbara M. Ashton
Kat has posted its contents on the Forum before.
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 12:36 pm
by doug65oh

They don’t call that magazine
Cracked for nothin’. It’s a sort of inferior step-child to
Mad … remember them? (Taking anything written in
Cracked seriously is…well, roughly akin to reading something in the old
Weekly World News and wondering, “Now why was this not front-page news in today's
Times?!!”)
Check out Jake Slocum's profile on the site, you'll get the idea.
