Yes, I too must agree with everyone.......it's a beautiful, classy and elegant dustjacket.
The person who colorized Lizzie did a very professional job. You can almost believe it was taken from an original color slide. Her hair color, skin.......he/she got it just right.
To those who have written that Lizzie Borden was plain and homely, have done her an injustice in print. I find her very attractive. Perhaps more alluring than beautiful, more sexy then gorgeous, more bewitching than charming, but never homely.
But, before I say anymore, please allow me to say I really love the cover. Who ever designed it did a wonderful job.
Now, that being said, let's flip the coin.
When it comes to judging a book by it's cover this dust jacket misses it's mark by 50%. It does not speak to its title PARALLEL LIVES. The book has been revealed as the telling of Lizzie Borden and the upper class in contrast to the common working man and the poor of Fall River, the place where Lizzie/Lizbeth lived.
Thus, the background photograph of the jacket does not give the whole picture. Though nothing extraordinary or interesting, or anything that would take away from the striking image of Lizzie, it is still the wrong photograph. Instead of a scene of the well-to-do in recreation or ceremony, it should have displayed a photo of the common man or woman, perhaps a mill scene, a street scene, a parade, a photo of the average working family etc., dressed for work or in their Sunday best.
After all, we have Lizzie on the cover as half of the "Parallel Equation," as the title denotes, but where is the other half, the masses of Fall River, those who made what the Bordens had become. Can we assume that they were not worthy enough to grace the cover? Would an image of children holding dinner pails and standing behind Lizzie soil the cover.......take something away from the pleasing aesthetics of the wrapper? Or, is it that they/it would be too dull. After all, everything in America is about image, the beautiful, the glamourous. Who wants to see poverty splattered. Conceivably, the cover designer knew what he was doing.
Now, if I got the precept or explanation of the title and of the book wrong, that is to say, that the book is about the Parallel lives of Lizzie Borden in comparison with the rest of the hoi polloi wealthy, then they got it just right, and I'm just blowing smoke. (which I do well)
Perhaps this approach of using a photo of the common Fall Riverite of the times was thought of and rejected. Either way it still is a marvelous cover. To me I just see it as a lost opportunity to give a better interpretation about what is behind the boards of this very informative volume.
Don't get me wrong. It's a real nice cover. I don't see anything unsuitable about it. Just that it could be improved to tell a better story
I may be wrong, or you may not agree, but at the very least, it gives you something to ponder and perhaps talk about.
Some may think I'm a little critical, speaking the way I do about the cover for Parallel Lives, especially since the book is not even for sale as of yet. (and he's already critiquing the cover)
But, as one of my favorite authors, Oscar Wilde, once said, "The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about."
