Where is the Bloody Petticoat?
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2021 1:58 pm
Working my way through the primary documents, so far I've gotten through the Inquest Testimonies and the Witness Statements, and now I'm about halfway through the Preliminary Hearing (up next the trial!). Early on in the hearing but well-into Dr. Dolan's testimony, in the cross-examination he's asked whether he examined any clothing from the house. The exchange reads:
"Q: Was any clothing given to you?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Who gave it to you?
A: I think Mr. Jennings.
Q: Where did he get it?
A: I don't know, he said he got it from Miss Lizzie Borden.
Q: What was it, a dress skirt and an under white skirt?
A: Yes sir and her waist.
Q: Did you examine them?
A: Yes sir.
Q: What do you mean by a waist, an outside or under waist?
A: A blouse waist.
Q: Where are those garments?
A: Prof. Wood has them all, so far as I know; I gave them to him.
Q: Did you examine those at the time?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Did you find some blood on them?
A: One blood spot on the skirt.
Q: How big was it?
A: The size of a good pin head.
Q: That is on the white underskirt?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Do you know whether it came from without, in, or from inside out?
A: From without, in.
Q: How do you know that?
A: Simply because the meshes of the cloth on the outside were filled with blood, and it had hardly penetrated on the inside.
Q: Did you look at it under a glass?
A: No sir."
(Koorey, Widows, & Koorey The Preliminary Hearing in the Lizzie Borden Case, pg. 93)
I know that the FRHS has the bedsheets Abby Borden was in the middle of putting on (along with quite a lot more). I'm wondering whether they have those garments being described here or if the whereabouts of these garments is known at all? I'm no blood analyst or anything of the kind but I imagine technology is pretty advanced today and, if the garment can be produced, an analyst could examine the blood on that petticoat and determine whether it was Abby's, Andrew's, or Lizzie's...at the very least it would be able to rule out menstrual blood as, if I'm not mistaken, was claimed by the defense.
"Q: Was any clothing given to you?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Who gave it to you?
A: I think Mr. Jennings.
Q: Where did he get it?
A: I don't know, he said he got it from Miss Lizzie Borden.
Q: What was it, a dress skirt and an under white skirt?
A: Yes sir and her waist.
Q: Did you examine them?
A: Yes sir.
Q: What do you mean by a waist, an outside or under waist?
A: A blouse waist.
Q: Where are those garments?
A: Prof. Wood has them all, so far as I know; I gave them to him.
Q: Did you examine those at the time?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Did you find some blood on them?
A: One blood spot on the skirt.
Q: How big was it?
A: The size of a good pin head.
Q: That is on the white underskirt?
A: Yes sir.
Q: Do you know whether it came from without, in, or from inside out?
A: From without, in.
Q: How do you know that?
A: Simply because the meshes of the cloth on the outside were filled with blood, and it had hardly penetrated on the inside.
Q: Did you look at it under a glass?
A: No sir."
(Koorey, Widows, & Koorey The Preliminary Hearing in the Lizzie Borden Case, pg. 93)
I know that the FRHS has the bedsheets Abby Borden was in the middle of putting on (along with quite a lot more). I'm wondering whether they have those garments being described here or if the whereabouts of these garments is known at all? I'm no blood analyst or anything of the kind but I imagine technology is pretty advanced today and, if the garment can be produced, an analyst could examine the blood on that petticoat and determine whether it was Abby's, Andrew's, or Lizzie's...at the very least it would be able to rule out menstrual blood as, if I'm not mistaken, was claimed by the defense.