Bailing out Uncle John

This the place to have frank, but cordial, discussions of the Lizzie Borden case

Moderator: Adminlizzieborden

Post Reply
User avatar
Harry
Posts: 4061
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 4:28 pm
Real Name: harry
Location: South Carolina

Bailing out Uncle John

Post by Harry »

John Morse was considered a material witness and released on bail. From Dance of Death by DeMille:

"Uncle Vinnicum was released on $300 bail put up by the Fall River Daily News. Bail in a murder case was customarily $500."

Why would Uncle John need a newspaper to put up the bail money when he himself was quite well off? Also why wouldn't Emma, who supposedly was fond of her uncle, put up the money?
I know I ask perfection of a quite imperfect world
And fool enough to think that's what I'll find
User avatar
doug65oh
Posts: 1583
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:26 am
Real Name:

Post by doug65oh »

...and who did Uncle (or the newspaper) know that they able to score a 40% discount on bail?? Wow...
User avatar
Allen
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:38 pm
Gender: Female
Real Name: Me

Post by Allen »

But where were Uncle John's assets tied up? Was that kind of money readily available to him in Fall River?
"He who cannot put his thoughts on ice should not enter into the head of dispute." - Friedrich Nietzsche
john
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:50 am
Real Name:
Location: black hills, sd

Post by john »

So many odd things.
Was the "Daily News" one of the papers that was owned in part by Andrew's old funeral home partner?
john
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:50 am
Real Name:
Location: black hills, sd

Post by john »

While I wonder also, if Emma was so ever fond of her uncle, while her uncle came to visit the Borden's (even live-in) occasionally, did the Bordens ever visit him, or Emma go to even visit him? Had they, or she, ever even, or eventually would they ever have? Evidently this makes it even more evocative.
john
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:50 am
Real Name:
Location: black hills, sd

Post by john »

FREE TRIPS TO HAWAII FOR THREE AND A FREE HUMMER at "Uncle John Killed Abby" site.
User avatar
Kat
Posts: 14785
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
Real Name:
Location: Central Florida

Post by Kat »

I think the bail had to be assured by a local- probably a business man. A local who could be held accountable?
I thought bail for Bridget & Morse were both $500.
I wonder what other sources say?
Nona
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 5:00 am
Real Name:
Location: Erlanger Kentucky

Post by Nona »

why would a material witness need to put up bail? Even if they were suspects......they wernt arrested.

And if Bridget had to put up bail.who paid Bridgets?
User avatar
Kat
Posts: 14785
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
Real Name:
Location: Central Florida

Post by Kat »

Well, that's how they did things *back then* I guess. Morse was basically from Iowa and Bridget was a foreigner.
It would be to assure they made it to court.
User avatar
snokkums
Posts: 2545
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Robin
Location: fayetteville nc,but from milwaukee
Contact:

Post by snokkums »

Why would Uncle John have to go to the paper to get the bail. Didn't the Bordens have money? And you are right what about Bridgets bail? Where did she get hers?
Suicide is painless It brings on many changes and I will take my leave when I please.
User avatar
Kat
Posts: 14785
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
Real Name:
Location: Central Florida

Post by Kat »

Well, in The Evening Standard paper, they seem to suggest that the bond is low for Bridget & Morse (and that Morse's bond was $500):

"Now that there is time to study every aspect of the tragedy, the amount of the bail required for Bridget Sullivan, the servant, and John V. Morse, is exciting comment. It is considered strange that the two persons who have been regarded as the most important witnesses for the government should have been placed under nominal bonds. If either of these witnesses dreaded the proceedings which are very sure to follow the arrest which has been made, either because they objected to further publicity, or for any other reason, there is nothing to detain them in Fall River, unless, as has been hinted, they are still under police surveillance. While the present feeling prevails, more than one person can be found who would gladly pay twice the bond demanded to embarrass the police; at least people so express themselves, and they talk as if they were in earnest. But, like other criticism, these comments may not rest on facts. Possibly the testimony of neither of the witnesses mentioned is so vital to the case as is generally supposed, and the government may have arranged to lay its hands on them at any moment. Furthermore, if there were any real object in spiriting them away, it would take considerable more security to hold them than is usually demanded. Until the end comes, therefore, it is well to take it for granted that the government knows what it is doing, and to assume that it is insane, and from now on the less effort expended in concocting puzzles and undertaking to unravel them the better for all concerned."
--Tuesday, August 16, 1892 Page 2

_______


"This is only new evidence of the ceaseless thinking Fall River people direct toward the tragedy and its many inexplicable features. The citizen, "Circumstances," and all others, for that matter, trouble John V. Morse little. He accounted for his time to the minute, almost. The police paid an eloquent tribute to the strength of his alibi when they placed him under $500 bonds and called off the shadows in citizens' clothes which dogged his footsteps previous to the arrest."
--Wednesday, August 24, 1892 Page 1
________

As to Bridget's bail:

"Messrs. Almy and Milne, proprietors of the Fall River Daily News, went bail for Mr. Morse and Bridget Sullivan. Bridget returned to her friend's residence on Division street."
--Saturday, August 13, 1892 Page 2
Post Reply