here's two new theories

This the place to have frank, but cordial, discussions of the Lizzie Borden case

Moderator: Adminlizzieborden

Post Reply
User avatar
snokkums
Posts: 2545
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Robin
Location: fayetteville nc,but from milwaukee
Contact:

here's two new theories

Post by snokkums »

:twisted: Here's one of the theories, that Lizzie killed her father because she was sexually abused by him. If you look at the picture, Andrews eye was unrecognizeable. That might have been symbolic that he was looking at her in the "wrong" way or something.

The other theory: at the time she had a boyfriend and the father didn't like the boyfriend. So she hides in the closet while he kills Abbey and Andrew.
It's a thought.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

With all due respect, "new" for whom? Do you mean that these are theories you haven't seen discussed before? Believe me, there are no new theories under the sun.

Except for mine: Lizzie discovered that her parents...parent and STEP-parent, I mean, had been taken over by beings from another dimension. So, she killed them.

Discuss...or don't!
User avatar
snokkums
Posts: 2545
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Robin
Location: fayetteville nc,but from milwaukee
Contact:

Post by snokkums »

just never heard these two before
Suicide is painless It brings on many changes and I will take my leave when I please.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

So, then, they were new to you. It's not fair of you to get our blood racing by making us think you've come up with theories those of us who have spent a good chunk of our lives on this case haven't seen yet.

Or, it could be blatant misrepresentation for attention. But I hope not.
User avatar
Allen
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:38 pm
Gender: Female
Real Name: Me

Post by Allen »

Bob Gutowski @ Wed Mar 23, 2005 4:42 pm wrote:So, then, they were new to you. It's not fair of you to get our blood racing by making us think you've come up with theories those of us who have spent a good chunk of our lives on this case haven't seen yet.

Or, it could be blatant misrepresentation for attention. But I hope not.
Or it could be that she hasn't spent a good chunk of her life researching this case, and doesn't know what theories have been discussed and haven't. Someone who doesn't know much about it, isn't apt to know what theories are new and which ones aren't. I think it's a little heavy handed to say things to someone without knowing how much they know or don't know about the case. :roll: Everybody has to start somewhere. No one starts out knowing all there is to know, and even those who have studied it for years still don't know all there is to know, because that's impossible.
"He who cannot put his thoughts on ice should not enter into the head of dispute." - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Angel
Posts: 2189
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:32 pm
Real Name:

Post by Angel »

Bob, that was a bit harsh. I remember asking some questions when I was new to the board that must have been answered many times before I joined, and everyone was very gracious in directing me to different sources. If someone had said something like that to me instead, I would have been very hesitant to post again. We are all here to share ideas and learn.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

Yes, except that if you're a newbie on ANY subject, you don't announce every thing you run across as a "new" theory. That's just the was it is, and this isn't the first time I've pointed that out here. This is a discussion board, not a support group for Borden novices. I'm happy to help out anyone who wants to learn about this maddening case, and I'm happy to learn anything I can, and to have my assumptions and opinions challenged. I'd like to think that a newbie on any site (and I've been in that situation many times) would approach any well-credentialed site, such as this one, with a little respect. Thus, I'd be really unhappy to see a thread entitled BRAND NEW PUZZLE!, only to find that the question was "So, did Lizzie have reddish or brownish hair?" Oldsters should make some allowances for newbies? Fine. Newbies should bear in mind they're going to be meeting up with people who've invested many years and much sweat and blood in this subject, and try not to cry "wolf."

I'm sorry if I seem harsh, but I am passionate about the Bordens. So be it.
User avatar
Angel
Posts: 2189
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:32 pm
Real Name:

Post by Angel »

As I am passionate about people's feelings. So be it.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

"just never heard these two before"

I didn't find that especially sensitive or caring. Instead, I sensed someone who was, possibly, a little ashamed to be caught out at her game.
User avatar
Angel
Posts: 2189
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:32 pm
Real Name:

Post by Angel »

Or, maybe she was eager to share and then felt deflated when she got such a response. I know I was excited when I found this board, and put out theories I thought were great, only to find out they had been rehashed a long time before I ever thought of them. I am grateful that everyone was patient with me.
User avatar
Smudgeman
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:51 am
Real Name: Scott
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Smudgeman »

I think you are blowing it out of proportion Bob, probably was a new theory to her.
Audrey
Posts: 2048
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:14 am
Real Name:

Post by Audrey »

Frankly, with all the problems we have had on the board lately with people sneaking in under numerous identities, making wild posts to accumulate post numbers to enter the privy and increase their post count, double posting, nonsensical posts et al...

It has left many of us long timers a little nonplussed.

I do not think Bob's intent was to offend..... Yet to ensure our wonderful community remains wonderful.


Snokkums.... I do not know how long you have been interested in Lizzie, or how much research you have done-- But the sexual abuse angle comes up in almost every discussion of the crimes. If you spent some time in the archives or with some of the resource materials you may find that 99% of your questions are answered....
User avatar
theebmonique
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:08 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Tracy Townsend
Location: Ogden, Utah

Post by theebmonique »

It's true that we have had a few "less than honorably intended sorts"...or sort I should say. It does make us a bit gun shy huh ?

Snokkums, keep trying. Audrey's suggestion of checking out the archives is an excellent idea. Also, the LAB website has some great info too. Getting a subscription to The Hatchet is another idea that could hook you up with some great info. Here's a link to the LAB website, the The Hatchet, and the archives.

http://www.lizzieandrewborden.com/LizzieABorden.htm

http://www.hatchetonline.com/HatchetOnline/index.htm

http://lizzieandrewborden.com/archive.htm


Tracy...
I'm defying gravity and you can't pull me down.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

Snok and everyone - truce for the weekend? Thanks to the last posters who calmly and eloquently helped me out, and maybe even told me things I didn't know about why I jumped on this so strongly.

I love, love, love this site.

Happy Friday,
Bob (who is reading a book of literary criticism called Hatchet Jobs, believe it or not.)
User avatar
snokkums
Posts: 2545
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Robin
Location: fayetteville nc,but from milwaukee
Contact:

Post by snokkums »

sorry if I offended anybody. But seriously, you all need toget a life if this is all you do. You are right, I have not spent all my life worrying about lizzie Bordon. Apparently, you all have.

GET A LIFE PEOPLE!!
I'LL BE SEEING YOU ALL. BYE.
Suicide is painless It brings on many changes and I will take my leave when I please.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

Well, then. Anyone for pinochle?
User avatar
Angel
Posts: 2189
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:32 pm
Real Name:

Post by Angel »

Sometimes a touch of class goes unrecognized and unappreciated. Sorry, Bob---you tried. That's what matters.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

Thank you , Angel - that was rather classy of you!
User avatar
theebmonique
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:08 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Tracy Townsend
Location: Ogden, Utah

Post by theebmonique »

OK...KEGGER AT AUDREY'S !!! We all need a drink !


Tracy...
I'm defying gravity and you can't pull me down.
Audrey
Posts: 2048
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:14 am
Real Name:

Post by Audrey »

Kegger?

MON DIEU!

Champagne perhaps in a hand blown flute... But a kegger?

Perish the though!
User avatar
theebmonique
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:08 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Tracy Townsend
Location: Ogden, Utah

Post by theebmonique »

LOL...so you DO know what a kegger is ! OK...we could change it to a champagne kegger. You will serve caviar won't you ?


Tracy...
I'm defying gravity and you can't pull me down.
Audrey
Posts: 2048
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:14 am
Real Name:

Post by Audrey »

Caviar is not my favorite... (OK-- I HATE it)
Nona
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 5:00 am
Real Name:
Location: Erlanger Kentucky

Post by Nona »

Ive been reading the posts Im new here to I'm Nona........here in Fl. really intrested in Lizzie just to let everyone know The first thing I did was to check the posts.get aquainted with everyones names, charachter. and read as much as i could i think I stayed like reading posts and archives for like 3 days (I have dial up) :( so just so you all know If I ever ask a question Iam sure that you will all take me seriously and not blow me off like snookums................he did have 95 posta and kept coming back he must have liked it here. it's obvious he left because his feelings were hurt so he said something mean as a defense.......I think some of you long timers should PM him and encourage him to get back in it.
User avatar
theebmonique
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:08 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Tracy Townsend
Location: Ogden, Utah

Post by theebmonique »

Welcome Nona ! It's so great that you found us ! :grin:

Snokkums is a she (Robin...I believe ?). This forum has a couple of options available for contacting fellow members. Not all members choose to'activate' the options on how they may be contacted, however. But, by checking someone's profile, you can find how they wish to be contacted "off the board". I am sure any person who wants to contact her probably already has, or is at least aware of 'how' to, in case they want to in the future. :smile:

Again...welcome ! :grin:


Tracy...
I'm defying gravity and you can't pull me down.
Nona
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 5:00 am
Real Name:
Location: Erlanger Kentucky

Post by Nona »

Tracy, good to know for future use.thank you for the info.:)
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

Hello, Nona. Snok wasn't blown off. Re-read the entire thread.
john
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:50 am
Real Name:
Location: black hills, sd

Post by john »

Hear you Audrey (include visiting people using your computer). I think you have excellent thinking Snookums, and I see it as no big deal for a Lizzie Borden "expert" just to read your thoughts, and especially to get upset about them - but then I'm not a Lizzie Borden "expert."
The boyfriend angle is something that has possibly been addressed by the "experts" from the wrong angle.
It would have been much easier for whoever did it (and somebody did) to have had Lizzie's help.
If Lizzie had complete knowledge of the crimes (or did them) she probably wouldn't have awakened Bridget so soonly.
If Lizzie had no knowledge of the crimes and discovered one of them she probably would have become very excited and wanted to leave the house (Bridget's actions are strange here too.)
If Lizzie had partial knowledge of the crimes, and she was in some way involved, she would have reacted shockly, not really knowing what she was doing, but not wanting the police involved.
The lastly is exactly what she did.
User avatar
Kat
Posts: 14785
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
Real Name:
Location: Central Florida

Post by Kat »

There has been a big boyfriend wrangle over David Anthony.
But he wasn't around until about the time of the crime (in theory) and then disappeared from Lizzie's life and then didn't appear again until much later, driving up to visit Lizbeth at Maplecroft on his motocycle.
Is this the Boyfriend to whom it is alluded?
Nona
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 5:00 am
Real Name:
Location: Erlanger Kentucky

Post by Nona »

If you ask me....I think the doc had Feelings for Lizzie........probably not returned but she could have used that to manipulate him a little bit when it came to telling the police about her Menstral time and the doc okaed it.
User avatar
snokkums
Posts: 2545
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:09 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Robin
Location: fayetteville nc,but from milwaukee
Contact:

Post by snokkums »

thats a good angle too nona. I never thought of that. she could have been in the time of the month and she mantipulate the doc. Good thinking!
Suicide is painless It brings on many changes and I will take my leave when I please.
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

"If Lizzie had partial knowledge of the crimes, and she was in some way involved, she would have reacted shockly (sic), not really knowing what she was doing, but not wanting the police involved.
The lastly (sic) is exactly what she did."

Well, even if Lizzie was the sole criminal, she may have reacted in that way, and to say she "would have reacted" in a definite way is to ignore the vast differences among people and their reactions, I'd say. I find her odd behavior (sending away the only other living person in the house, insisting that her stepmother be looked for with the odd explanation, "I don't know but that she is killed, too, for I thought I heard her come in") indicative of guilt, whether she acted alone or not.
diana
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 1:21 pm
Real Name:

Post by diana »

I agree Lizzie staying in the house with her murdered father seems odd. But couldn't one also wonder why Mrs. Churchill was not afraid to come into the murder house – or to leave Lizzie alone while she ran to the stables to ask Thomas Boulds to get a doctor? And why she made no attempt to notify the police before she returned to the house to stay alone with Lizzie until Dr. Bowen and the others arrived? From that perspective, it does seem as though neither woman thought there was any danger of the murderer still being in the vicinity.

And I know I’m nit picking here – but we really only have other people’s word for it that Lizzie said she thought she heard Abby come in. Both Mrs. Churchill and Bridget testified she did say that – but Lizzie denied it at the inquest.

As Allen pointed out in an earlier post, it’s quite possible that Mrs. C. and Bridget testified to this because Lizzie did say it. But, I’m being an annoying stickler here and reminding us we can only say ‘people testified Lizzie said she heard her stepmother come in’ – not ‘Lizzie said she heard her stepmother come in’.

“Q. Did you tell Maggie you thought your mother had come in?
A. No sir.
Q. That you thought you heard her come in?
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you say to anybody that you thought she was killed upstairs?
A. No sir.
Q. To anybody?
A. No sir. . . .

. . . Q. I want you to give me all that you did, by way of word or deed, to see whether your mother was dead or not, when you found your father was dead.
A. I did not do anything, except what I said to Mrs. Churchill. I said to her: "I don't know where Mrs. Borden is. I think she is out, but I wish you would look." (Inquest, L. Borden)
User avatar
Smudgeman
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:51 am
Real Name: Scott
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Smudgeman »

Well, this leads me back to the whole "note" thing. "She had a note, someone was sick", "I thought I heard her come in", "I don't know where Mrs. Borden is, I wish you would look." This to me makes Lizzie look very guilty, which is it? Did Abby go out or did you hear her come back in? You can't have it both ways, either she left or she did not. I think this was discussed in another thread, but I just can't remember which one right now. I think it was the period after Mrs. Churchill came over that Lizzie supposedly said she thought she heard Abby come in. Maybe she said that to say she heard some noises in the house to throw the suspision off of herself, but she never committed to if she heard them or not - VERY evasive our Miss Lizzie! I tend to believe Mrs. Churchill and Bridget, but I don't know why?
Lizzie was in the mode of ordering everyone else to go and do things, get the doctor, go look for Abby, but there was no reason she could have helped do those things. Maybe she wanted to be alone in the house to take care of some business, she was making herself the victim at that point. Look at me, my parents have just been murdered, please do as I say. She should have run out the house screaming bloody murder and hysterical if she was going to play the victim , huh?
john
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:50 am
Real Name:
Location: black hills, sd

Post by john »

Why would it be advantageous for Mrs. Borden to be found at the time she was, instead of laterly (sorry Bob) like she surely would have been?
I won't answer my own question.
And why would Lizzie deny sending anyone to look for Mrs. Borden?
I won't answer my own question.
User avatar
Allen
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:38 pm
Gender: Female
Real Name: Me

Post by Allen »

diana @ Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:44 pm wrote:I agree Lizzie staying in the house with her murdered father seems odd. But couldn't one also wonder why Mrs. Churchill was not afraid to come into the murder house – or to leave Lizzie alone while she ran to the stables to ask Thomas Boulds to get a doctor? And why she made no attempt to notify the police before she returned to the house to stay alone with Lizzie until Dr. Bowen and the others arrived? From that perspective, it does seem as though neither woman thought there was any danger of the murderer still being in the vicinity.

And I know I’m nit picking here – but we really only have other people’s word for it that Lizzie said she thought she heard Abby come in. Both Mrs. Churchill and Bridget testified she did say that – but Lizzie denied it at the inquest.

As Allen pointed out in an earlier post, it’s quite possible that Mrs. C. and Bridget testified to this because Lizzie did say it. But, I’m being an annoying stickler here and reminding us we can only say ‘people testified Lizzie said she heard her stepmother come in’ – not ‘Lizzie said she heard her stepmother come in’.

“Q. Did you tell Maggie you thought your mother had come in?
A. No sir.
Q. That you thought you heard her come in?
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you say to anybody that you thought she was killed upstairs?
A. No sir.
Q. To anybody?
A. No sir. . . .

. . . Q. I want you to give me all that you did, by way of word or deed, to see whether your mother was dead or not, when you found your father was dead.
A. I did not do anything, except what I said to Mrs. Churchill. I said to her: "I don't know where Mrs. Borden is. I think she is out, but I wish you would look." (Inquest, L. Borden)
This takes me back to the whole if Lizzie did it she would lie about anything to cover her butt theory.
"He who cannot put his thoughts on ice should not enter into the head of dispute." - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Kat
Posts: 14785
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
Real Name:
Location: Central Florida

Post by Kat »

You're both right, Scott and Diana.
Diana is correct to specify what Lizzie claims she said vs. what others say she said.
And Scott is right in alluding to that note business, because that was the she-said/she-said matter which was also confusing and which I believe Robinson used in the trial to his advantage. He was adamant that Bridget heard Abby tell her (Bridget) that she had gotten a note and it obfuscated the truth. He was so stubborn about it, I think he mixed himself up and really believed it!

But what Mrs. Churchill said, at the inquest,, about what Lizzie said was thus:

Q. Have you now told all you know of all that happened in your presence with relation to the affair?
A. Yes Sir.
Q. And all that was said in your presence?
A. I cannot tell you when she said it, I am very particular what I tell, she said once she wished somebody would try to find Mrs. Borden because she thought she heard her come in. Whether she sat on the stairs when she said it, I cant tell you. She thought she heard her come in. I cant tell when she told it to me, whether before or after I went after the Doctor; she said it to me.
Q. You are sure you did hear it?
A. O. yes.
Q. Was that the occasion of your going to look for Mrs. Borden?
A. No Sir. After that she said again she wished we would go up stairs and see if we could find Mrs. Borden.
Q. When she said she thought she had heard her come in, was said before she said she wished you would go up stairs?
A. Yes, before that.
Q. Have you now told all that was said in your presence, that you have heard?
A. Yes Sir.
.....

--Which sounds pretty definite.
But:

In the Witness Statements everyone says they heard no noise at all. Lizzie said she was in the barn loft and heard no noise, yet Mrs. Churchill says:

Prelim
Mrs. Churchill
271
Q. What happened then?
A. I put my hand on her arm, and said “O, Lizzie”, I said “Where is your father”? She said “in the sitting room”. I said “where were you when it happened”? She said she went to the barn to get a piece of iron, and came back, heard a distressed noise, and came in, and found the screen door open.

--I can't seem to find in Lizzie's inquest or Witness Statement that she "heard" a "moan", "groan", "noise" or "sound."
Is this another one of those *she said/she said*?

Some newspaper said Lizzie heard a groan and went inside and found Abby!
User avatar
Allen
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:38 pm
Gender: Female
Real Name: Me

Post by Allen »

john @ Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:49 pm wrote:Why would it be advantageous for Mrs. Borden to be found at the time she was, instead of laterly (sorry Bob) like she surely would have been?
I won't answer my own question.
And why would Lizzie deny sending anyone to look for Mrs. Borden?
I won't answer my own question.
Why would it be advantageous? Because she didn't want to be the one to find the second body. There were plenty of people there and granted sooner or later someone was going to wonder where Abby was and go and look for her anyway. Bridget had already said she wished she knew where Mrs. Whitehead lived so she might go and look for Abby. They were sending a telegram to tell Emma about it, how would she pull off not wanting to find Abby to tell her that her husband was dead "until later"? But Lizzie didn't want to wait until later, because she wanted to be able to get up to her room and out of the spotlight.
"He who cannot put his thoughts on ice should not enter into the head of dispute." - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Kat
Posts: 14785
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:59 pm
Real Name:
Location: Central Florida

Post by Kat »

We passed each other posting Allen. :smile:
User avatar
Susan
Posts: 2361
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:26 pm
Real Name:
Location: California

Post by Susan »

--I can't seem to find in Lizzie's inquest or Witness Statement that she "heard" a "moan", "groan", "noise" or "sound."
Is this another one of those *she said/she said*?

Some newspaper said Lizzie heard a groan and went inside and found Abby!
Yes, it is another *she said/she said*, its in Bridget's Preliminary Testimony:

Q. Calling your attention; whether you had any talk with her, in which she said anything about hearing her groan?

Page 34

(Objected to.)
(Mr. Knowlton) I have exhausted the witness’ recollection, and now direct her attention.
(Court) If it is for the purpose of refreshing her recollection of something which you are confident is within her knowledge, the question may be put in that form.
Q. Yes. Miss Lizzie said she was out in the yard, and she heard a groan.
(Mr. Adams) Heard a groan, or heard her groan?
A. Heard her father groan I should think.
Q. What did you say to her before that?
A. I asked her where she was. She said she was out in the back yard. She heard a groan, and she came in, and the screen door was wide open.
“Sometimes when we are generous in small, barely detectable ways it can change someone else's life forever.”-Margaret Cho comedienne
Bob Gutowski
Posts: 875
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:44 am
Real Name:
Location: New York City

Post by Bob Gutowski »

Very cuteley, John! ;}

I think a guilty Lizzie might want another look at Mr. Borden, or a few more moments to make sure everything's in order (bloody cloths and dresses hidden or concealed, father "sincerely" dead, etc.) before the doctor should arrive. Of course, he didn't arrive, and Lizzie decided to send Maggie for good old reliable Alice - but then she noticed that Mrs. Churchill across the way was looking over. Doesn't Addy's testimony mention that Lizzie didn't immediately come out with the request to come over, but that there were a few moments of everyday blather?

More to the point, why should Mrs. Churchill, a friendly witness if ever there was such a thing, manufacture Lizzie's odd request for someone to run upstairs and look for the strangely silent Mrs. Borden? I think Lizzie (guilty) wanted to have someone else discover Mrs. B. It didn't occur to her to ask to be helped to her room, so everyone on the stairs could've seen Abby at once. Hmm. Maybe Lizzie really didn't want to have to look at her handiwork again!

There still is the incredible situation that no one except maybe Maggie seemed very bothered that there might be a murderer hanging about the premises. We may wonder why Lizzie didn't call Maggie down and rush out of the house with her, if innocent or guilty, claiming that she was afraid that the killer might still be nearby, that stranger who hated her rude father (go ask Alice all about it!).

This case cries out for an Agatha Christie-like multiple play DVD; one of the TV documentaries tried to dramatize several of the theories at once and ended up with Uncle John passing Billy Borden in the hallway!
User avatar
Haulover
Posts: 721
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 1:44 pm
Real Name: Eugene Hosey
Location: Sycamore, AL

Post by Haulover »

***--I can't seem to find in Lizzie's inquest or Witness Statement that she "heard" a "moan", "groan", "noise" or "sound."
Is this another one of those *she said/she said*?

Some newspaper said Lizzie heard a groan and went inside and found Abby!***

____________

ditto. i was positive that was all over the witness statements from lizzie herself.

i think it was mrs. churchill that convinced me she did actually say it. that is, i think mrs. churchill knows what she's talking about. just like it is particularly mrs. churchill who knows that lizzie has tried to fool them with a fake dress.

the groan/distressing/scraping -- that has always interested me -- but i swear i believed it was all in the witness statements. (back to basics time, i guess?) or perhaps my memory is becoming more creative?

but this i think i remember -- that mrs. churchill is the only witness to lizzie that morning who seems to know the difference between what she knows she remembers and what she knows she can't be sure of -- that's what i mean about churchill.
User avatar
theebmonique
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:08 am
Gender: Female
Real Name: Tracy Townsend
Location: Ogden, Utah

Post by theebmonique »

Bob Gutowski
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 1:02 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very cuteley, John! ;}

Bob G.,

We may have to forgive john until he, or whever is on his computer these days, has a chance to read the posts in Stay to Tea in the SCHOOL IS IN SESSION !!! thread. :wink: :wink:


Tracy...
I'm defying gravity and you can't pull me down.
Post Reply